June 22, 2026

How (And Why) To Build Generational Wealth

Hot take: ultra-rich people who leave their children with nothing are virtue signaling (and raising kids who will hate them)

In partnership with

I saw a post by an entrepreneur recently that I could not disagree with more…

(Strap in, this one is gonna get spicy!)

This entrepreneur is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. And he stated plainly that he won’t be leaving his son any money.

Instead, he’ll be leaving his son wisdom. His son will earn his own money and by doing so, will learn to appreciate the value of hard work (paraphrasing).

Here’s my hot take:

This is an extremely toxic mindset that does more to virtual signal than actually help his child.

Firstly, it risks irreparable damage to the parent-child relationship. You don’t have to look very far to find children of ultra-wealthy people that despise their parents. But that aside, there is another important mistake being made:

It is an illusion that a parent must choose between passing down money OR wisdom to their children.

This is a false dilemma. The solution is to pass down both.

Many of the ideas I will discuss today are fleshed out in Johann Kurtz’s book Leaving a Legacy

This becomes very clear when you starting looking at “generational wealth” as more than just dollars in a bank account. To teach your kids to be stewards, not dependents. To set them up to compound what you built, not lose it.

Here’s why it is your moral imperative to build generational wealth.

I told you this was going to get spicy, didn’t I?

The "Character Building" Argument Is Really a Parenting Confession

A good person leaves an inheritance for their children's children, but a sinner's wealth is stored up for the righteous.

Proverbs 13:22

Every time someone says "I don't want to spoil my kids with money," they're accidentally revealing something: they don't trust their own ability to raise wise children.

Hear me out.

A selection of quotes curated by Johann Kurtz on his Substack, Becoming Noble

Think about it. If you taught your child sound principles about money, work, and responsibility… if you modeled stewardship instead of consumption… if you truly believed in your ability to impart wisdom to your child… would you really worry about him blowing an inheritance?

The problem was never the money itself. It’s the parents.

We all know or have heard stories of spoiled rich kids who lack basic understanding of the money that they’ve inherited. Is that the money’s fault, or the parents’?

The spoiled rich kid isn't spoiled because he inherited money. He's spoiled because nobody taught him about money. And that responsibility falls squarely on… you guessed it, the parents.

The Compounding Math Is Brutal

Let's run the numbers on what "starting from zero to bUiLd cHaRaCtEr" actually costs your kids.

  • A child who inherits $50,000 at age 25 and invests it at 7% annual returns has $1.07 million by age 65.

  • A child who starts from zero at 35 and manages to save the same $50,000 by age 40 has $590,000 by age 65.

Kurtz puts it in sterner words than I do.

That 10-year head start is worth nearly half a million dollars using a very conservative return profile. At an 8-10% return, they’re losing out on half of their potential future wealth.

And that's assuming your "character-building" child even manages to save the same amount you could have given him for free!

Most don't. Because while he's spending his twenties learning lessons you already know, he's also dealing with student loans, rent, inflation, and the basic math of survival.

Kurtz again does not hold back!

Furthermore, the child will be forced to pursue a lucrative career path over something that might pay less but is more aligned with their interests (and society’s).

This isn't about fairness or equality. It's math. And math is brutally honest. It doesn't care about your parenting philosophy.

A Symptom of Conflating Wealth With Money

The problem is that most people think inheritance is about the dollar amount you leave behind.

I speak at length on this topic all the time.

Wealth is way more than just money. And yet the term “generational wealth” almost always refers to the dollar figure.

Generational wealth is often associated with land (and not just its price tag).

So here’s my humble suggestion:

Reframe “Generational Wealth” to include more than just money.

Most people inherently already do this, but don’t notice it. When you think about how you want to raise your kids, you likely already think of:

  • Providing them with a good education

  • Ensuring they are healthy - physically, mentally, and spiritually

  • Bestowing upon them wisdom and strong moral character

  • Protecting them from danger

  • Raising them with the means to discover and achieve their purpose

Now if you want to provide your child with all of those things, and then we introduce money, it becomes plain as day.

Considering our ultimate goals are the above, if you had the option to leave your child with money, why wouldn’t you?

I suspect most normal, well-adjusted people know this. But we are inundated with news headlines and tabloids about celebrities and the ultra-wealthy leaving their kids with nothing as if it’s a virtue.

It’s not. It’s irresponsible and unethical.

The smart play is building wealth systematically while teaching your kids the same system. They inherit the knowledge, the habits, and the head start.

How to Raise Responsible Stewards of Wealth

Ok, so maybe I have you convinced at a high level. So how do we actually accomplish this?

You can't just hand over money and hope for the best. That’s exactly the caricature that most people have in their mind when they think of wealthy people leaving money to their spoiled kids.

Here are some ideas:

Talk openly about money. Not just the amount you have, but the principles behind how you think about it. Why you invest instead of save in cash. Why you bought real estate. Why you own Bitcoin! Make your financial decision-making transparent.

Involve them in decisions. When they're teenagers, show them how you evaluate investments. Let them sit in when you're discussing the family budget. Explain why you said yes to one purchase and no to another.

Start small and scale up. Give them skin in the game early. A 16-year-old managing a $1,000 investment account learns more about stewardship than a 25-year-old inheriting a $100,000 trust fund with no context.

Create a family investment account. Start with $10,000. Give each child equal voting power in what to buy. Teach them to research companies, understand financial statements, and think long-term. They learn stewardship by practicing it.

Match their contributions. If your 22-year-old saves $5,000, you contribute $5,000 to the same investment. They learn that capital comes from discipline, not birthright. But they also get the added compounding benefit of starting earlier than they would have on their own.

Give them progressively more responsibility. At 16, they manage $1,000. At 18, they manage $10,000. At 22, they get their full inheritance—but by then, they've already proven they know how to handle it.

This is cathedral thinking applied to family wealth. You're not building for yourself. You're building a foundation that your kids can expand on.

Wealth Without a Steward Dies With You

This is one of the core messages of Johann Kurtz’s work that deeply resonated with me. Maybe it will resonate with you, too.

Every dollar you don't pass to your children gets passed to institutions instead.

The government via estate taxes. Universities via inflated tuition and donations. Financial advisors via management fees. Or faceless, nameless charities run by people who enrich their own families while asking others for their sacrifice.

There's something backward about a charity executive who pays his own kids' college tuition while telling donors that inheritance somehow corrupts character.

Do you believe in your own values? Do you believe your worldview produces better outcomes than the mainstream? If yes, then why wouldn't you want to compound that influence through your children?

Building generational wealth isn’t selfish. This is the same faulty logic that leads people to believe that having children is selfish.

I’d go so far as saying that just like having children is a moral imperative, so is leaving them generational wealth (not just money) so that they can fulfill their fullest potential.

FAQ

Q: What if I don't have a lot of money to pass down?

A: Generational wealth starts with the system, not the dollar amount. Teaching your 20-year-old son to think about wealth building is worth more than giving your 40-year-old son $50,000 with no financial education. The principles compound faster than the money. But they both matter. That’s my point.

Q: How do I know if my kids are ready for larger amounts?

A: Start with small tests. Give them $1,000 to invest and see what they do with it. Do they research what they’re buying? Do they check on it obsessively or let it compound? Do they understand why you chose that amount? Their behavior with $1,000 will predict their behavior with $100,000.

Q: What about estate taxes?

A: Estate planning is beyond the scope of this article, but the principle remains the same. Whether you're passing down $50,000 or $5 million, the system matters more than the amount. A well-educated heir will compound $50,000 into $5 million. A poorly educated heir will lose $5 million in no time at all.

Q: Should I tell my kids exactly how much they'll inherit?

A: This is a personal decision that I can’t make for you. But I lean toward no. "You'll inherit enough to give you options, but not enough to replace your need to work" is a good guideline. They need to understand the number before they know the number. The goal is to give them a planning horizon without removing their incentive to build their own wealth.

Q: What if my kids aren't interested in money or investing?

A: Make it interesting! Here at Wealth Potion, I connect building wealth to leveling up in a video game, but that’s one of many examples. If they want to be an artist, show them how financial independence gives them creative freedom. If they want to travel, show them how assets generate passive income. If they want to change the world, show them how capital amplifies impact. And so on. Make it relevant to their interests.

The Bottom Line

Building generational wealth isn't about choosing between spoiling your kids and making them earn everything from scratch. It's about raising children who understand both the power and the responsibility of capital.

We are about to witness the greatest wealth transfer in history. Will it go to their children, or to 501c3 charities?

Kids who inherit money and wisdom will compound both. Kids who inherit only money usually lose it. Kids who inherit only wisdom start decades behind kids whose parents gave them both, and they will likely grow resentment toward you.

Making your kids' lives harder to “build character” is a cop-out at best, cruel at worst.

One of the best things you can do as a parent is to make your children’s lives more leveraged so they can build something even bigger than what you started.

To your (and your children’s) prosperity,
Brandon @ Wealth Potion

Ready to build the system you'll pass down to your kids? Join Wealth Potion and start thinking generationally.

LLM traffic converts 3× better than Google search

58% of buyers now start their research in ChatGPT or Gemini, not Google. Most startups aren't showing up there yet.

The ones that are get cited by the AI tools their buyers, investors, and future hires already use. And they convert at 3×.

Download the free AEO Playbook for Startups from HubSpot and get the exact steps to start showing up. Five minutes to read.